Brand identity in 2026 doesn't look the way it did five years ago, and neither do the studios producing it. The post-pandemic recalibration of corporate identity, the maturation of AI-assisted design tools, and Gen Z's appetite for visual identity that actually means something have created conditions where a new kind of studio thrives: smaller, more opinionated, less interested in safe minimalism, and more willing to treat branding as a cultural act rather than a corporate exercise.
This is not a ranked list. There's no number one. What connects these ten studios is simpler than that: each is doing work right now that makes other designers stop scrolling, and each is pushing the discipline in a direction that feels genuinely new rather than cyclically nostalgic. Established names sit alongside studios you may not have heard of yet. That's deliberate. The most interesting work in branding has always happened at the intersection of reputation and hunger.
Pentagram
New York / London / Berlin / Austin / Shanghai
Pentagram has been covered extensively in these pages, including our recent Studio Spotlight on the firm's new guard, but their inclusion here is non-negotiable. Under newer partners like Sascha Lobe, Jody Hudson-Powell, and Yuri Suzuki, the studio has evolved from an identity consultancy rooted in print craft into something more plural: a practice where generative systems, motion-first thinking, and sensory design sit alongside the typographic rigour the firm was built on. The sheer range of their 2024–2026 output, from cultural institutions to technology platforms, makes Pentagram impossible to ignore, even for people who'd prefer to champion underdogs.
Collins
New York
Brian Collins built his studio on a conviction that brands should function as culture, not just commerce. Recent work for clients including Twitch, Dropbox, and Medium demonstrates a consistent thesis: identity systems should generate emotional resonance at scale. Where many agencies retreat to safe geometric wordmarks and muted palettes, Collins consistently swings for work that provokes reaction. Their approach (strategy-led, emotionally driven, systemically built) has made them the studio that brand teams call when they want to be talked about, not just recognised. We'll be publishing a full Studio Spotlight on Collins tomorrow.
Dinamo
Basel / Berlin
Dinamo operates at the intersection of type design and brand identity with a fluency that most foundries can't match and most branding agencies don't attempt. Their typefaces (Whyte, Monument, ABC) have become the visual shorthand for a generation of digital-native brands, but the studio's identity work goes far beyond licensing fonts. Dinamo's approach treats typography as a system of cultural signalling, and their collaborations with brands and institutions have consistently produced identities that feel both technically precise and culturally alive. Our Spotlight on Dinamo explored how they've made type design feel urgent again.
DIA Studio
New York
Mitch Paone's DIA Studio has become synonymous with motion identity, the idea that a brand's primary expression should be kinetic, not static. Their work for clients across music, fashion, and technology treats movement, rhythm, and transformation as first-class design elements. In a landscape where too many agencies bolt a logo animation onto a static identity as an afterthought, DIA builds from motion outward. The result is branding that feels native to screens, feeds, and environments where nothing stays still. Their recent systems work proves that motion-first doesn't mean shallow: these are rigorous, rule-based identity systems that happen to move.
Sagmeister & Walsh (now &Walsh)
New York
Since Jessica Walsh took sole ownership and rebranded to &Walsh, the studio has doubled down on what made it distinctive: a willingness to treat brand identity as a maximalist, emotionally charged proposition. In an era when most tech companies converge on the same clean sans-serif-and-gradient formula, &Walsh's work for clients in beauty, hospitality, and consumer goods deliberately pushes toward richness, texture, and personality. Their recent packaging and identity projects have demonstrated that "distinctive" and "systematic" aren't opposites: you can build a coherent brand system from bold, idiosyncratic visual language.
Werklig
Helsinki
Finland's Werklig rarely appears on English-language "best of" lists, which says more about the lists than the studio. Their identity work (for Nordic cultural institutions, technology firms, and public-sector clients) combines the restraint you'd expect from Scandinavian design with a conceptual sharpness that elevates every project beyond mere aesthetics. Werklig's recent rebrand work for Helsinki's cultural ecosystem demonstrated that public-sector identity design can be as ambitious and craft-intensive as any consumer brand. Their type-driven approach treats every letterform as an argument about what the brand believes.
Bureau Borsche
Munich
Mirko Borsche's studio has spent the past several years producing identity work that sits at the precise intersection of editorial design, contemporary art, and commercial branding. Their client list (spanning fashion houses, cultural institutions, and media brands) reflects a practice that refuses to pick a lane. Bureau Borsche's identities feel authored in a way that most agency work doesn't: there's a recognisable intelligence behind the decisions, even as the visual expression varies dramatically from project to project. Recent work for Balenciaga and various Munich cultural institutions has cemented their reputation as a studio that treats every brief as an opportunity for graphic invention.
Koto
London / Los Angeles / Sydney
Koto has positioned itself as the studio for brands navigating the space between startup energy and scaled-up credibility. Their identity work for technology companies (including recent projects for platforms in fintech, productivity, and creator tools) demonstrates an ability to create systems that feel fresh without being trendy, and structured without being corporate. What distinguishes Koto from the crowded field of "digital-first branding agencies" is their consistency: project after project delivers identities that are both visually distinctive and obviously buildable across dozens of touchpoints. That combination of creativity and pragmatism is rarer than it sounds.
Mucho
Barcelona / San Francisco / Paris
Mucho brings a distinctly Southern European sensibility to global brand identity work, warm, confident, and unafraid of personality. Founded in Barcelona by former Pentagram designer Pablo Juncadella, the studio's work spans cultural institutions, luxury brands, and technology companies, with a portfolio that demonstrates unusual range without losing coherence. Their recent identity systems for clients across Europe and the Americas show a studio that understands how to build brands that work simultaneously across Latin, European, and North American markets. In a field dominated by New York and London, Mucho is proof that geographic decentring produces better work.
Wedge
Tokyo
Wedge represents a strain of Japanese brand identity practice that the Western design press consistently under-covers. The studio's work (for fashion, hospitality, and cultural clients) treats brand identity as a spatial and material practice, not just a graphic one. Their identities extend into environmental design, packaging systems, and physical retail experiences with a seamlessness that reflects Japan's long tradition of integrated design thinking. Recent projects demonstrate that the most interesting identity work being done in Asia-Pacific right now treats the distinction between "brand design" and "experience design" as an artificial boundary.
Practice
New York / Sydney
Practice has emerged as one of the most consistently compelling mid-size studios in the identity space, with work for cultural institutions, technology brands, and nonprofit organisations that balances intellectual rigour with visual warmth. Co-founded by two former Pentagram designers, the studio brings large-consultancy thinking to a scale that allows for deeper client relationships and more considered output. Their recent identity work has earned attention not for provocation but for precision, systems that feel inevitable rather than imposed, as though the brand had always looked this way and simply needed someone to find it.
What Connects Them
Ten studios, four continents, no single aesthetic. But patterns emerge.
First, systems over marks. Every studio on this list designs identity systems, not just logos. The static mark is a component, not the centrepiece. This reflects a broader shift: brands now exist across too many contexts for any single artifact to carry the identity alone.
Second, type as strategy. At least half of these studios treat typography not as a style choice but as a strategic instrument, choosing, commissioning, or designing typefaces that do conceptual work, not just visual work. Dinamo and Bureau Borsche make this most explicit, but it runs through all ten practices.
Third, geographic pluralism. The strongest identity work in 2026 isn't concentrated in one city or market. Helsinki, Munich, Tokyo, and Barcelona are producing work as vital as anything coming out of New York or London. The studios that understand multiple cultural contexts are building brands that travel better.
Fourth, conviction over consensus. None of these studios produces work that looks like it was designed by committee. Whether maximalist or restrained, motion-first or type-driven, each practice has a point of view, and the confidence to defend it when a client's instinct is to play it safe.
The brand identity landscape will keep shifting. AI tools will change workflows. New markets will demand new visual languages. But the studios that thrive will be the ones that bring genuine intelligence, craft, and cultural fluency to every project, and these ten are proving that right now.
WeLoveDaily is a design publication for people who care about how things look, work, and feel.
